Here's a thinking process:
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on Evil Source community forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article as a FULL, in-depth forum post.
- **CRITICAL RULES:**
- 1 to 3 paragraphs exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought.
- Write the ENTIRE story - no summarizing/cutting short. Include every detail, fact, insight.
- EXCITING, casual, direct forum style - like telling friends about something mind-blowing.
- Add own commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Include ALL key information: who, what, when, where, why, how.
- Include specs, prices, dates, names if present.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- If additional sources: 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>'
- NO headline or markdown headers.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph.
- **Input Article:** About Midjourney wanting Hollywood studios (Warner Bros. Discovery, Disney, Universal) to show how they use AI in court, as the studios sued Midjourney for copyright infringement. Midjourney claims fair use and points out studios do the same thing. Asking for AI business plans, research reports, training datasets, model weights, board presentations. Judge allowed studios to withhold most, only handing over "consumer-facing" AI info. Midjourney wants to overturn. Lawyer Bobby Ghajar wrote about "unclean hands" defense. Could set precedent. Published July 4, 2026 by Mariella Moon on Engadget.
2. **Check Constraints:**
- Paragraphs: 1-3 exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences.
- Content: Entire story, every detail.
- Tone: Exciting, casual, direct forum style, personal commentary.
- Format: Line breaks, no headers, end with Source/Also see.
- Length: Must be substantial but strictly within paragraph/sentence limits.
I need to carefully count sentences per paragraph to ensure each is between 4 and 8. I'll aim for 2 paragraphs to stay safely within the 1-3 range, each with 5-7 sentences.
3. **Draft - Paragraph 1:**
Hey everyone, you are not going to believe the absolute chess match happening in the AI vs. Hollywood courtroom right now because Midjourney is absolutely demanding that Warner Bros. Discovery, Disney, and Universal Studios drop their entire AI training files on the court! Back in 2024, those massive studios sued the image generator, claiming it was copyright infringement that it could somehow conjure up Superman, Batman, and other heavily protected characters. Midjourney’s legal team, led by attorney Bobby Ghajar, is fighting back hard by arguing that training AI on publicly available images is totally fair use, and honestly, they have a point because the studios are literally doing the exact same thing with their own internal models. To prove this double standard, Midjourney is now asking the federal court to force those companies to hand over their AI business plans, internal research reports, training datasets, model weights, and even the actual board meeting presentations they used to pitch AI strategies. I mean, come on, if they’re trying to punish Midjourney for learning from the internet, they should be terrified of showing us how they train their own systems behind closed doors!
*Sentence count check:* 5 sentences. Good. Covers: who (Midjourney, WBD, Disney, Universal), what (lawsuit, discovery request), when (lawsuit last year/2024, current request), why (fair use, double standard), details (Superman/Batman, business plans, datasets, weights, board presentations, lawyer Bobby Ghajar).
4. **Draft - Paragraph 2:**
Things just got even more spicy because a magistrate judge actually allowed the studios to withhold almost everything related to their AI development back in mid-June, only letting them release data strictly tied to "consumer-facing" apps. Midjourney is now begging the federal court to completely overturn that ruling, pointing out that the hidden evidence directly supports both its fair use argument and its "unclean hands" defense against the lawsuit. If Midjourney can successfully prove that the plaintiffs are guilty of the exact practice they’re trying to sue over, it absolutely weakens the studios' entire legal standing and could set a massive precedent for how we handle AI copyright cases moving forward. This is literally going to shape the future of creative tech, so
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on Evil Source community forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article as a FULL, in-depth forum post.
- **CRITICAL RULES:**
- 1 to 3 paragraphs exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought.
- Write the ENTIRE story - no summarizing/cutting short. Include every detail, fact, insight.
- EXCITING, casual, direct forum style - like telling friends about something mind-blowing.
- Add own commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Include ALL key information: who, what, when, where, why, how.
- Include specs, prices, dates, names if present.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- If additional sources: 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>'
- NO headline or markdown headers.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph.
- **Input Article:** About Midjourney wanting Hollywood studios (Warner Bros. Discovery, Disney, Universal) to show how they use AI in court, as the studios sued Midjourney for copyright infringement. Midjourney claims fair use and points out studios do the same thing. Asking for AI business plans, research reports, training datasets, model weights, board presentations. Judge allowed studios to withhold most, only handing over "consumer-facing" AI info. Midjourney wants to overturn. Lawyer Bobby Ghajar wrote about "unclean hands" defense. Could set precedent. Published July 4, 2026 by Mariella Moon on Engadget.
2. **Check Constraints:**
- Paragraphs: 1-3 exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences.
- Content: Entire story, every detail.
- Tone: Exciting, casual, direct forum style, personal commentary.
- Format: Line breaks, no headers, end with Source/Also see.
- Length: Must be substantial but strictly within paragraph/sentence limits.
I need to carefully count sentences per paragraph to ensure each is between 4 and 8. I'll aim for 2 paragraphs to stay safely within the 1-3 range, each with 5-7 sentences.
3. **Draft - Paragraph 1:**
Hey everyone, you are not going to believe the absolute chess match happening in the AI vs. Hollywood courtroom right now because Midjourney is absolutely demanding that Warner Bros. Discovery, Disney, and Universal Studios drop their entire AI training files on the court! Back in 2024, those massive studios sued the image generator, claiming it was copyright infringement that it could somehow conjure up Superman, Batman, and other heavily protected characters. Midjourney’s legal team, led by attorney Bobby Ghajar, is fighting back hard by arguing that training AI on publicly available images is totally fair use, and honestly, they have a point because the studios are literally doing the exact same thing with their own internal models. To prove this double standard, Midjourney is now asking the federal court to force those companies to hand over their AI business plans, internal research reports, training datasets, model weights, and even the actual board meeting presentations they used to pitch AI strategies. I mean, come on, if they’re trying to punish Midjourney for learning from the internet, they should be terrified of showing us how they train their own systems behind closed doors!
*Sentence count check:* 5 sentences. Good. Covers: who (Midjourney, WBD, Disney, Universal), what (lawsuit, discovery request), when (lawsuit last year/2024, current request), why (fair use, double standard), details (Superman/Batman, business plans, datasets, weights, board presentations, lawyer Bobby Ghajar).
4. **Draft - Paragraph 2:**
Things just got even more spicy because a magistrate judge actually allowed the studios to withhold almost everything related to their AI development back in mid-June, only letting them release data strictly tied to "consumer-facing" apps. Midjourney is now begging the federal court to completely overturn that ruling, pointing out that the hidden evidence directly supports both its fair use argument and its "unclean hands" defense against the lawsuit. If Midjourney can successfully prove that the plaintiffs are guilty of the exact practice they’re trying to sue over, it absolutely weakens the studios' entire legal standing and could set a massive precedent for how we handle AI copyright cases moving forward. This is literally going to shape the future of creative tech, so