Here's a thinking process:
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on "Evil Source" forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article as a FULL, in-depth, exciting forum post.
- **CRITICAL RULES:**
- 1 to 3 PARAGRAPHS exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought.
- Include EVERY detail, fact, insight from the article.
- EXCITING, casual, direct forum style.
- Add own commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Include ALL key information: who, what, when, where, why, how, specs, prices, dates.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- If additional sources, add: 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>'
- Make it the DEFINITIVE version.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph. A single sentence is NOT acceptable.
- **Source Article:** Tidal won’t pay royalties on AI-generated music but isn’t banning it outright (The Verge, Jun 29, 2026)
- **Key Details to Include:**
- Tidal shared new AI music policies to "protect artists" and "inform listeners"
- Not banning AI music outright
- Starting July 15, 2026: 100% AI-generated tracks will get a label/icon
- Starting today (June 29, 2026): 100% AI tracks are no longer monetizable
- Quote: "Tidal’s priority is ensuring royalties go to original works directly produced, written, and performed by people. We will therefore not knowingly attribute royalties to music we identify as wholly AI-generated"
- Detection tools not specified yet, but plans to eventually label "substantially AI-generated" tracks as tools improve
- Tidal will enforce expectations that content distributors properly label AI music (not just Tidal's responsibility)
- Mid-July 2026: Remove/block AI music with "fraudulent activity"
- Fraudulent activity defined as: music exploiting individuals'/groups' music, name, or likeness; deceiving listeners; diminishing service quality; high-volume uploads; unusual streaming activity
- Competitor context: Spotify launched verification program in April (green checkmark/"Verified by Spotify" for real people, AI profiles ineligible)
- Deezer developed detection tools to reduce visibility of fully AI-generated uploads, and created a website to scan playlists on other platforms for AI tracks
- Author: Andrew Liszewski, Senior Reporter at The Verge
- Date: Jun 29, 2026
- Source URL: https://www.theverge.com/tech/959211/tidal-ai-music-policy-demonetizingdetect-label
2. **Check Constraints:**
- 1-3 paragraphs exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences.
- Include EVERY detail.
- Exciting/passionate tone.
- Add commentary/opinions.
- End with Source: URL.
- Add Also see: if relevant.
- No single-sentence paragraphs.
- Make it DEFINITIVE.
3. **Draft Construction (Mental Refinement):**
*Paragraph 1: The core news, dates, and monetization shift.*
Tidal just dropped a massive policy update on how they handle AI-generated music, and honestly, it’s exactly the kind of proactive move we’ve been waiting for! Starting today, any track that’s identified as 100 percent AI-generated will immediately lose its monetization status, meaning creators won’t be able to rack up royalties from purely synthetic uploads. Instead of kicking AI music off the platform entirely, Tidal is taking a much smarter approach by rolling out a dedicated icon label on July 15th, 2026, to clearly flag those fully AI-made songs for listeners. The company’s official statement makes their stance crystal clear: they want royalties flowing directly to original works “produced, written, and performed by people,” so they won’t knowingly attribute payments to wholly AI-generated music. I absolutely love that they’re demonetizing first and labeling second—it cuts out the middleman and stops the royalty bleed before it even starts!
*Paragraph 2: Detection, distributor expectations, and fraud prevention.*
What really gets me excited is how Tidal is building this system for the long haul, especially with their plans to eventually expand that label to tracks that are
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on "Evil Source" forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article as a FULL, in-depth, exciting forum post.
- **CRITICAL RULES:**
- 1 to 3 PARAGRAPHS exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought.
- Include EVERY detail, fact, insight from the article.
- EXCITING, casual, direct forum style.
- Add own commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Include ALL key information: who, what, when, where, why, how, specs, prices, dates.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- If additional sources, add: 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>'
- Make it the DEFINITIVE version.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph. A single sentence is NOT acceptable.
- **Source Article:** Tidal won’t pay royalties on AI-generated music but isn’t banning it outright (The Verge, Jun 29, 2026)
- **Key Details to Include:**
- Tidal shared new AI music policies to "protect artists" and "inform listeners"
- Not banning AI music outright
- Starting July 15, 2026: 100% AI-generated tracks will get a label/icon
- Starting today (June 29, 2026): 100% AI tracks are no longer monetizable
- Quote: "Tidal’s priority is ensuring royalties go to original works directly produced, written, and performed by people. We will therefore not knowingly attribute royalties to music we identify as wholly AI-generated"
- Detection tools not specified yet, but plans to eventually label "substantially AI-generated" tracks as tools improve
- Tidal will enforce expectations that content distributors properly label AI music (not just Tidal's responsibility)
- Mid-July 2026: Remove/block AI music with "fraudulent activity"
- Fraudulent activity defined as: music exploiting individuals'/groups' music, name, or likeness; deceiving listeners; diminishing service quality; high-volume uploads; unusual streaming activity
- Competitor context: Spotify launched verification program in April (green checkmark/"Verified by Spotify" for real people, AI profiles ineligible)
- Deezer developed detection tools to reduce visibility of fully AI-generated uploads, and created a website to scan playlists on other platforms for AI tracks
- Author: Andrew Liszewski, Senior Reporter at The Verge
- Date: Jun 29, 2026
- Source URL: https://www.theverge.com/tech/959211/tidal-ai-music-policy-demonetizingdetect-label
2. **Check Constraints:**
- 1-3 paragraphs exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences.
- Include EVERY detail.
- Exciting/passionate tone.
- Add commentary/opinions.
- End with Source: URL.
- Add Also see: if relevant.
- No single-sentence paragraphs.
- Make it DEFINITIVE.
3. **Draft Construction (Mental Refinement):**
*Paragraph 1: The core news, dates, and monetization shift.*
Tidal just dropped a massive policy update on how they handle AI-generated music, and honestly, it’s exactly the kind of proactive move we’ve been waiting for! Starting today, any track that’s identified as 100 percent AI-generated will immediately lose its monetization status, meaning creators won’t be able to rack up royalties from purely synthetic uploads. Instead of kicking AI music off the platform entirely, Tidal is taking a much smarter approach by rolling out a dedicated icon label on July 15th, 2026, to clearly flag those fully AI-made songs for listeners. The company’s official statement makes their stance crystal clear: they want royalties flowing directly to original works “produced, written, and performed by people,” so they won’t knowingly attribute payments to wholly AI-generated music. I absolutely love that they’re demonetizing first and labeling second—it cuts out the middleman and stops the royalty bleed before it even starts!
*Paragraph 2: Detection, distributor expectations, and fraud prevention.*
What really gets me excited is how Tidal is building this system for the long haul, especially with their plans to eventually expand that label to tracks that are