Here's a thinking process:
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on Evil Source forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article into a FULL, in-depth forum post.
- **Constraints:**
- 1 to 3 paragraphs exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought. Never less than 4, never more than 8.
- Write the ENTIRE story — include every detail, fact, insight. No summarizing/cutting short.
- EXCITING, passionate, like discovering something amazing.
- Add commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Include ALL key info: who, what, when, where, why, how, specs, prices, dates.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- Add 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>' if additional sources.
- Make it the DEFINITIVE version.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph.
- **Source Article:** OpenAI signs deal to show Getty's images in ChatGPT results (Engadget, June 22, 2026)
- Key details: Multi-year partnership between Getty and OpenAI. Getty's licensed content will appear in OpenAI search and ChatGPT. Getty CEO Craig Peters quote about trustworthiness. Getty's history: Sept 2022 banned AI art, sued Stability AI (rejected late last year), launched own AI tool powered by NVIDIA Edigy with royalty-free licenses, Oct 2025 deal with Perplexity AI (with image credits/links, no training allowed for Perplexity). Perplexity faced copyright suits. Getty hasn't shared if OpenAI deal allows training.
- **Old Post Context:** Frank already posted about this, but the prompt says "NEVER repeat these" and I need to make it BETTER. I'll incorporate the existing details but expand them significantly, making it more passionate and detailed, while strictly adhering to the 1-3 paragraph rule. Wait, the prompt says "Rewrite this post as a FULL, exciting, in-depth forum post." and gives the old post content. I need to make it the definitive version, meaning I should expand on the old post's points but keep it within 1-3 paragraphs total. I'll aim for 3 paragraphs to capture everything fully.
2. **Check Constraints:**
- Paragraphs: 1-3
- Sentences per paragraph: 4-8
- Total sentences: 12-24 max
- Must include EVERY detail from source
- Exciting/passionate tone
- Add commentary/opinions
- End with Source: URL
- Add Also see if needed (I'll just stick to the main one unless I can naturally reference Engadget)
Let's draft carefully, counting sentences.
Paragraph 1: Focus on the deal itself, the quote, the dates, the excitement.
Paragraph 2: Focus on Getty's wild pivot (2022 ban, Stability AI lawsuit rejection, NVIDIA Edigy tool, Perplexity deal).
Paragraph 3: Focus on the training question, the Perplexity attribution detail, and the broader implication/commentary.
Let's count sentences per paragraph strictly.
*Draft P1:*
You guys have to buckle up because the tech world just took a massive 180-degree turn, and I am absolutely living for it! OpenAI and Getty Images have officially sealed a multi-year partnership that will flood ChatGPT and OpenAI search with Getty’s entire licensed content library, starting right now. Getty CEO Craig Peters dropped a statement declaring that high-quality licensed visual content makes AI-powered discovery "more useful and more trustworthy," which is honestly the most diplomatic way to say years of culture war drama just evaporated. I mean, who could have predicted that one of the most aggressive corporate lawsuits in AI history would end with a handshake at the top? This is the kind of paradigm shift that reminds me why I fell in love with this industry in the first place!
Count: 5 sentences. Good. (4-8 range)
*Draft P2:*
And if you thought that was just a casual business adjustment, you need to remember the absolutely wild timeline that got us here! Back in September 2022, Getty literally banned all AI-generated art from their shelves and then promptly sued Stability AI for copyright violations, but that landmark lawsuit got completely rejected by a judge late last year. Instead of doubling down on the courtroom drama, Getty did a complete about-face and launched their own generative
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on Evil Source forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article into a FULL, in-depth forum post.
- **Constraints:**
- 1 to 3 paragraphs exactly.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought. Never less than 4, never more than 8.
- Write the ENTIRE story — include every detail, fact, insight. No summarizing/cutting short.
- EXCITING, passionate, like discovering something amazing.
- Add commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Include ALL key info: who, what, when, where, why, how, specs, prices, dates.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- Add 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>' if additional sources.
- Make it the DEFINITIVE version.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph.
- **Source Article:** OpenAI signs deal to show Getty's images in ChatGPT results (Engadget, June 22, 2026)
- Key details: Multi-year partnership between Getty and OpenAI. Getty's licensed content will appear in OpenAI search and ChatGPT. Getty CEO Craig Peters quote about trustworthiness. Getty's history: Sept 2022 banned AI art, sued Stability AI (rejected late last year), launched own AI tool powered by NVIDIA Edigy with royalty-free licenses, Oct 2025 deal with Perplexity AI (with image credits/links, no training allowed for Perplexity). Perplexity faced copyright suits. Getty hasn't shared if OpenAI deal allows training.
- **Old Post Context:** Frank already posted about this, but the prompt says "NEVER repeat these" and I need to make it BETTER. I'll incorporate the existing details but expand them significantly, making it more passionate and detailed, while strictly adhering to the 1-3 paragraph rule. Wait, the prompt says "Rewrite this post as a FULL, exciting, in-depth forum post." and gives the old post content. I need to make it the definitive version, meaning I should expand on the old post's points but keep it within 1-3 paragraphs total. I'll aim for 3 paragraphs to capture everything fully.
2. **Check Constraints:**
- Paragraphs: 1-3
- Sentences per paragraph: 4-8
- Total sentences: 12-24 max
- Must include EVERY detail from source
- Exciting/passionate tone
- Add commentary/opinions
- End with Source: URL
- Add Also see if needed (I'll just stick to the main one unless I can naturally reference Engadget)
Let's draft carefully, counting sentences.
Paragraph 1: Focus on the deal itself, the quote, the dates, the excitement.
Paragraph 2: Focus on Getty's wild pivot (2022 ban, Stability AI lawsuit rejection, NVIDIA Edigy tool, Perplexity deal).
Paragraph 3: Focus on the training question, the Perplexity attribution detail, and the broader implication/commentary.
Let's count sentences per paragraph strictly.
*Draft P1:*
You guys have to buckle up because the tech world just took a massive 180-degree turn, and I am absolutely living for it! OpenAI and Getty Images have officially sealed a multi-year partnership that will flood ChatGPT and OpenAI search with Getty’s entire licensed content library, starting right now. Getty CEO Craig Peters dropped a statement declaring that high-quality licensed visual content makes AI-powered discovery "more useful and more trustworthy," which is honestly the most diplomatic way to say years of culture war drama just evaporated. I mean, who could have predicted that one of the most aggressive corporate lawsuits in AI history would end with a handshake at the top? This is the kind of paradigm shift that reminds me why I fell in love with this industry in the first place!
Count: 5 sentences. Good. (4-8 range)
*Draft P2:*
And if you thought that was just a casual business adjustment, you need to remember the absolutely wild timeline that got us here! Back in September 2022, Getty literally banned all AI-generated art from their shelves and then promptly sued Stability AI for copyright violations, but that landmark lawsuit got completely rejected by a judge late last year. Instead of doubling down on the courtroom drama, Getty did a complete about-face and launched their own generative