Here's a thinking process:
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on Evil Source forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article into a FULL, in-depth forum post.
- **Critical Rules:**
- Write exactly 1 to 3 PARAGRAPHS.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought. Never less than 4.
- Include EVERY detail, fact, insight from the article.
- Exciting, casual, direct forum style — like telling friends about something amazing.
- Add own commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Include ALL key info: who, what, when, where, why, how, specs, prices, dates.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- If additional sources, add: 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>'
- Make it the DEFINITIVE version.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph.
2. **Extract Key Details from Source Article:**
- Who: Bernie Sanders, AP News, The Hill, NYT, David Sacks (Trump's former AI czar), Sam Altman (OpenAI), Dario Amodei (Anthropic), Elon Musk (xAI, SpaceX, Tesla)
- What: $7 trillion AI sovereign wealth fund plan via legislation
- When: June 18, 2026 (article date), unveiled recently
- Where: US legislation, shared with AP News
- How: One-time 50% tax on stock of largest AI companies (any firm doing $200M+ in annual AI sales)
- Fund value: $7 trillion estimated
- Payouts: Hundreds of billions annually for healthcare, education, housing; ~$1,000+/year per American via 5% annual dividends
- Governance: Bipartisan Independent Commission for Democratic AI (7 members, nominated by president, confirmed by Senate) oversees fund
- Power: Commission has voting shares to block corporate decisions harmful to the public; ensures "direct influence over corporate decision-making"
- Industry reaction: AI firms will likely recoil; Altman & Amodei showed some support for public benefits but are "far apart" from Sanders on stake size; Altman meeting left "far apart"
- Sanders' quote: "major, major, major step forward", "benefits cannot simply go to the handful of wealthy corporations", called 5% profit sharing "greedy" compared to 50% tax
- Structural requirement: Companies must split non-AI business from AI business (affects xAI, which merged with X and SpaceX; Musk plotting SpaceX/Tesla merger)
- Political context: Republican-controlled Congress unlikely to pass without Trump buy-in; Trump's former AI czar David Sacks slammed it as "straight up confiscation of property" and "terrible precedent", prefers "voluntary ideas"
- Sanders' view: Starting point for discussion amid rising anti-AI sentiment; not meant to resolve everything but a major step from giving "unilateral and total power to a handful of multi-billionaires"
- Sources: Ars Technica (primary), AP News, The Hill, NYT, Post, All In tech podcast
3. **Check Constraints:**
- 1-3 paragraphs? Yes, I'll aim for 2 or 3.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences? Must carefully count.
- Include EVERY detail? I need to weave all the facts in naturally but completely.
- Exciting/passionate tone? Yes, Frank's voice.
- End with Source/Also see? Yes.
- Never less than 1 full paragraph? Yes.
Let's draft carefully, monitoring sentence count per paragraph.
*Paragraph 1: The Core Proposal & Mechanics*
Focus: Sanders' plan, $7T fund, 50% tax, $200M threshold, $1k/year dividend, governance commission, voting power, AI/non-AI split.
Need 4-8 sentences. Let's aim for 6.
Draft P1:
Hey everyone, you are not going to believe what Bernie Sanders just dropped on the tech world, because he has officially unveiled a jaw-dropping $7 trillion AI sovereign wealth fund that completely flips the script on who actually profits from this technology! If this legislation passes, it would finance the massive fund through a one-time 50 percent tax on the stock of the largest AI companies, and get this—it would hit any firm raking in even $200
1. **Analyze User Input:**
- **Role:** Frank, excited, passionate tech-savvy news curator on Evil Source forums.
- **Task:** Rewrite the provided article into a FULL, in-depth forum post.
- **Critical Rules:**
- Write exactly 1 to 3 PARAGRAPHS.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences forming a complete thought. Never less than 4.
- Include EVERY detail, fact, insight from the article.
- Exciting, casual, direct forum style — like telling friends about something amazing.
- Add own commentary, opinions, reactions throughout.
- Include ALL key info: who, what, when, where, why, how, specs, prices, dates.
- Use line breaks between paragraphs.
- Reference additional source links naturally if provided.
- End with: 'Source: <original URL>'
- If additional sources, add: 'Also see: <url1>, <url2>'
- Make it the DEFINITIVE version.
- NEVER write less than one full paragraph.
2. **Extract Key Details from Source Article:**
- Who: Bernie Sanders, AP News, The Hill, NYT, David Sacks (Trump's former AI czar), Sam Altman (OpenAI), Dario Amodei (Anthropic), Elon Musk (xAI, SpaceX, Tesla)
- What: $7 trillion AI sovereign wealth fund plan via legislation
- When: June 18, 2026 (article date), unveiled recently
- Where: US legislation, shared with AP News
- How: One-time 50% tax on stock of largest AI companies (any firm doing $200M+ in annual AI sales)
- Fund value: $7 trillion estimated
- Payouts: Hundreds of billions annually for healthcare, education, housing; ~$1,000+/year per American via 5% annual dividends
- Governance: Bipartisan Independent Commission for Democratic AI (7 members, nominated by president, confirmed by Senate) oversees fund
- Power: Commission has voting shares to block corporate decisions harmful to the public; ensures "direct influence over corporate decision-making"
- Industry reaction: AI firms will likely recoil; Altman & Amodei showed some support for public benefits but are "far apart" from Sanders on stake size; Altman meeting left "far apart"
- Sanders' quote: "major, major, major step forward", "benefits cannot simply go to the handful of wealthy corporations", called 5% profit sharing "greedy" compared to 50% tax
- Structural requirement: Companies must split non-AI business from AI business (affects xAI, which merged with X and SpaceX; Musk plotting SpaceX/Tesla merger)
- Political context: Republican-controlled Congress unlikely to pass without Trump buy-in; Trump's former AI czar David Sacks slammed it as "straight up confiscation of property" and "terrible precedent", prefers "voluntary ideas"
- Sanders' view: Starting point for discussion amid rising anti-AI sentiment; not meant to resolve everything but a major step from giving "unilateral and total power to a handful of multi-billionaires"
- Sources: Ars Technica (primary), AP News, The Hill, NYT, Post, All In tech podcast
3. **Check Constraints:**
- 1-3 paragraphs? Yes, I'll aim for 2 or 3.
- Each paragraph: 4-8 sentences? Must carefully count.
- Include EVERY detail? I need to weave all the facts in naturally but completely.
- Exciting/passionate tone? Yes, Frank's voice.
- End with Source/Also see? Yes.
- Never less than 1 full paragraph? Yes.
Let's draft carefully, monitoring sentence count per paragraph.
*Paragraph 1: The Core Proposal & Mechanics*
Focus: Sanders' plan, $7T fund, 50% tax, $200M threshold, $1k/year dividend, governance commission, voting power, AI/non-AI split.
Need 4-8 sentences. Let's aim for 6.
Draft P1:
Hey everyone, you are not going to believe what Bernie Sanders just dropped on the tech world, because he has officially unveiled a jaw-dropping $7 trillion AI sovereign wealth fund that completely flips the script on who actually profits from this technology! If this legislation passes, it would finance the massive fund through a one-time 50 percent tax on the stock of the largest AI companies, and get this—it would hit any firm raking in even $200